<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: LinkedIn: Optimizing Your Profile</title> <atom:link href="http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/linkedin-optimizing-your-profile.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/linkedin-optimizing-your-profile.html</link> <description>Freelance SEO Consultant</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Geoff Andrews</title><link>http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/linkedin-optimizing-your-profile.html/comment-page-1#comment-8</link> <dc:creator>Geoff Andrews</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:21:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/?p=140#comment-8</guid> <description>Nice post… interesting to see how something so simple and readily available as a LinkedIn profile could be used to aid first page domination for your brand…</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post… interesting to see how something so simple and readily available as a LinkedIn profile could be used to aid first page domination for your brand…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gareth</title><link>http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/linkedin-optimizing-your-profile.html/comment-page-1#comment-7</link> <dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:20:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/?p=140#comment-7</guid> <description>Hey Darren, thanks for dropping by and your comments.  Interesting, going to have to test your snippet now with some other queries.
Thanks for spotting the canonical tag prob, new to thesis and still taming the beast :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Darren, thanks for dropping by and your comments.  Interesting, going to have to test your snippet now with some other queries.</p><p>Thanks for spotting the canonical tag prob, new to thesis and still taming the beast <img
src='http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SEO Mofo</title><link>http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/linkedin-optimizing-your-profile.html/comment-page-1#comment-6</link> <dc:creator>SEO Mofo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:52:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/?p=140#comment-6</guid> <description>Nice article and thanks for the shout out.  =)
Here&#039;s a tip/caveat for anyone thinking about trying to make an ASCII art design with their Meta Description: Google will only use your Meta Description content for the SERP snippet if there is NOT a relevant string of text in the &lt;body&gt; content.
Why does this matter? Because most people will NOT be able to rank well for a given keyword...unless they use that keyword throughout the page. In other words, my fancy snippet shown above will only appear for a small number of branded queries (e.g. [seomofo] and [worlds greatest seo]) and the [site:] search operator.
(BTW...Gareth, you&#039;re the first person I&#039;ve seen with 3 canonical tags in your &lt;head&gt; section. =P  )</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article and thanks for the shout out.  =)</p><p>Here&#8217;s a tip/caveat for anyone thinking about trying to make an ASCII art design with their Meta Description: Google will only use your Meta Description content for the SERP snippet if there is NOT a relevant string of text in the &lt;body&gt; content.</p><p>Why does this matter? Because most people will NOT be able to rank well for a given keyword&#8230;unless they use that keyword throughout the page. In other words, my fancy snippet shown above will only appear for a small number of branded queries (e.g. [seomofo] and [worlds greatest seo]) and the [site:] search operator.</p><p>(BTW&#8230;Gareth, you&#8217;re the first person I&#8217;ve seen with 3 canonical tags in your &lt;head&gt; section. =P  )</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gareth</title><link>http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/linkedin-optimizing-your-profile.html/comment-page-1#comment-5</link> <dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:21:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/?p=140#comment-5</guid> <description>Hi Andrea...yer I hear you, just need to find the right balance.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrea&#8230;yer I hear you, just need to find the right balance.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrea Moro</title><link>http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/linkedin-optimizing-your-profile.html/comment-page-1#comment-4</link> <dc:creator>Andrea Moro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:08:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/?p=140#comment-4</guid> <description>That&#039;s an interesting article. Even adding these extra &quot;features&quot; to the surname, linkedin search engine is smart enough to find the person.
Also moving the surname into the name area.
I would suggest to don&#039;t use the &gt;&gt; unless you want see them in the final profile unencoded showing an &gt; &gt; that is really orrible.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting article. Even adding these extra &#8220;features&#8221; to the surname, linkedin search engine is smart enough to find the person.<br
/> Also moving the surname into the name area.</p><p>I would suggest to don&#8217;t use the &gt;&gt; unless you want see them in the final profile unencoded showing an &gt; &gt; that is really orrible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
